CompliRun Raises $4.2M Seed Round to Expand Continuous Compliance Monitoring
The round will fund integration expansion, ISO 27001 depth improvements, and two new engineering hires focused on evidence collection reliability.
Compliance engineering insights from the CompliRun team and guest contributors.
The round will fund integration expansion, ISO 27001 depth improvements, and two new engineering hires focused on evidence collection reliability.
The answer depends on where your customers are located, not which framework sounds more impressive on your security page.
A SOC 2 Type II opinion covers a 12-month period. If your monitoring is not continuous, you have no idea what happened in months 2 through 11.
A checklist of IAM evidence requests we see in every Big Four SOC 2 audit — and which ones take the most time to gather without automation.
Manual quarterly access reviews fail in predictable ways. Here is what actually breaks and what an automated workflow fixes.
The 2022 revision reduced controls from 114 to 93 and reorganized them into four themes. Here is what that means for your existing implementation.
Type I is faster to complete. In practice, most enterprise buyers require Type II. If you do not plan for the observation period from day one, Type I costs you time.
CC9.2 — the vendor management criterion — is consistently underprepared. Here is exactly what to collect and how to keep it current.
Most incident response policies are written to satisfy an auditor, not to guide an engineer at 2 AM. They often fail at both. Here is the difference.
A security group rule changed three months ago. Nothing broke. But it opened a port that conflicts with your SOC 2 CC6.6 control description. Your auditor asks about it on day two of fieldwork.
The way you organize evidence directly affects how long auditor fieldwork takes. Poor structure can add 3–5 days to a typical engagement.